US prosecutors argue against judge in Trump case | Donald Trump News


United States prosecutors involved in the case of Donald Trump in Florida questioned the judge’s decision that it shows the dangers that would favor the former US president.

Their 24-page document was released late Tuesday, as part of a continuous charge looking at Trump’s reaction group documents after leaving office.

In remand, Special Counsel Jack Smith and his prosecution team criticized Judge Aileen Cannon for ordering instructions to be given to jurors who thought Trump could have withheld classified documents as part of “preserving” his records.

The judge’s order was seen as a tipping point in the defenders’ arguments that the Presidential Records Act (PRA) gave Trump the right to keep sensitive government documents, which Smith and his team disputed.

“Those rules are flawed,” Smith and his colleagues wrote, adding that any jury instructions to that effect would “disrupt the case”.

The court filing was an unusual display of tension between the prosecution and the judge, whom Trump appointed to the bench.

Special counsel Jack Smith has questioned the order of a judge who appears to be testifying against Trump. [Jacquelyn Martin/AP Photo]

Questions on the judges

Judge Cannon, who works for the federal court in the Southern District of Florida, was faced with the decisions he made in the long-running case.

In September 2022, for example, he agreed A request by Trump’s legal team to have a “special master” appointed to sift through documents taken from the former president’s Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, Florida.

Legal experts criticized the move as unprecedented, and it was late The US Department of Justice to have access to the documents as part of its investigation. An appellate court he finally finished the master’s special commentary.

In court on Tuesday, Special Counsel Smith and his team argued that Judge Cannon’s order would not only increase the jury’s discretion, but also significantly reduce the case.

No trial date has been set for the selected cases. It was the first federal indictment Trump faced as a result of the Smith investigation.

“Whatever the Court decides, it must quickly resolve these important questions,” Smith and his colleagues wrote. “Failure to do so would unduly undermine the Government’s right to a fair trial.”

Photo of Aileen Cannon in a Zoom meeting.  He is facing the camera, speaking, the US flag is visible in the background.
Judge Aileen Cannon, seen here in an official Senate photo, will face scrutiny over her handling of the Trump cases. [US Senate/AP Photo]

Saving predictions

The trial began in 2021, shortly after Trump left office in January. According to the ruling, the National Archives and Records Administration attempted to obtain documents believed to have remained with the former president.

But Trump and his allies have reportedly refused to turn over the documents, instead trying to hide in the unguarded areas of the Mar-a-Lago estate, including in the bathroom and shower area.

In March 2022, the Federal Bureau of Investigation opened a criminal investigation into the matter, and the Supreme Court asked Trump to return all the documents.

Special Counsel Smith, who was appointed by the US Department of Justice in November, criticized Trump for blocking subpoenas and other efforts to retrieve the documents, which contained national security secrets.

The government also found more than 300 documents at the Mar-a-Lago resort, where many public events took place.

Trump faces 40 charges related to classified documents. His assistant Walt Nauta is an employee of Mar-a-Lago Carlos De Oliveira was also charged.

The former president, however, always denies wrongdoing he did not plead not guilty. As part of his defense, he also claimed that he had tampered with the documents before leaving office, even though audio tracks have been playing while he is showing some of them.

“As president, I could have isolated myself, but now I can’t,” Trump said in a 2021 speech.

Trump’s legal team has also raised the question of whether the documents fall within the scope of “personal information” under the Presidential Records Act.

But in court Tuesday, Smith and his attorneys sought to settle the dispute.

“Mr. Trump has never represented to this court that he designated the documents as personal,” he wrote. “The reason is simple: they have never done this before.”

Smith and his team also said that, based on the Presidential Records Act, Trump wanted his actions to be “inadmissible” for review.

“It would be presumptuous to say that classified documents created by intelligence and military officials that were given to the President of the United States during his time in office were “confidential,”” other courts have said harshly. part of the voice.

Trump is the subject of four separate charges, including classified documents. He has made all four claims, however, that it was created by a politically motivated “witch hunt” that will affect his election in November.

The first trial expected to be filed against the federal government in New York, regarding hush-hush payments in the 2016 presidential race, is scheduled to begin on April 15.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *