Musicians take on Silicon Valley

[ad_1]

TikToks of Spongebob covering Summer Sorrow or Shrek belting Eye of the Tiger are not only annoying, they can also destroy the music industry. At least if you pay attention to what the top musicians have to say on the matter. What would make a killer but a disruptor of the festival, more than 200 artists have signed an open letter imploring tech platforms to investigate AI infringements on the arts.

Nicki Minaj, the estate of Bob Marley, Smokey Robinson, Sheryl Crow, and some of the most difficult ones such as Elvis Costello, and Norah Jones were among the signatories of the letter written by the Artist Rights Alliance. Like AI they shootpeople to office to the world of Hollywood have expressed concerns about how uncontrolled AI could affect their industries and the world at large. The music industry too, because the introduction of AI has led to debates about the culture and legitimacy of a. wave of imitation catalogs of sweeping artists. This is not the first time for the singers pushed back against the AI, but now the stars are pointing more, calling Silicon Valley directly. “The biological attack on humans must be stopped,” the letter said, calling for protection against AI.

“When used carelessly, AI poses serious threats to our ability to protect our privacy, our privacy, our music and our lives,” the petition said. “The biggest and most powerful companies, without permission, use our work to train AI models.” The artists feel that this permanent system of replacing singers with AI-generated music will “significantly reduce the royalties pool,” and make more of the existing musicians. trying not to move. In short, he warns of a future that is “dangerous.”

The film industry has also fought back against the onslaught of AI, with SAG-AFTRA remaining on the defensive and holding off on signing a contract until the so-called “zombie clause,” where the actor’s image will be modified and used in future projects, was completed. The union fought for language that would require the permission of actors, require them to be paid for their appearance, and impose penalties for using celebrity endorsements such as signing the venue.

The letter comes after the news has spread Developers of ChatGPT OpenAI now have an integrated voice a device that only needs 15 seconds to hear a person’s voice. OpenAI has stopped releasing the technology publicly due to security concerns ahead of its release.

The pledge writers, speaking directly to the professional world, are asking for similar clauses to those reached in the SAG-AFTRA agreement. “We call on all AI developers, technology companies, platforms and digital music services to promise not to create or install AI music production technology, content or tools that interfere with or change the creativity of songwriters and artists or deny us compensation for the work. ours, “says the artists, expressing concerns about how AI can disrupt and take away the freedom” of musicians. Some of the signatories are dead, while the communities of Bob Marley and Frank Sinatra signed the letter. Of course, these artists have big visions and are very mature to appeared in other Coachella performances such as. Tupac or simply controlled by AI simulation.

But artists aren’t directly asking for AI to stop; it’s probably useless anyway. The signatories make it clear that “When used correctly, AI has great potential to improve human creativity and in a way that supports the development and growth of innovation and entertainment for music lovers everywhere.”

“We’re not thinking about legislation right now,” Jen Jacobsen, executive director of The Artist Rights Alliance, said Axios. Instead they are “calling on our technology and digital partners to work with us to make this a trusted marketplace.” A few years ago, the founder of the Midjourney AI firm, David Holz, predicted that Forbes that this AI enters technology can go two ways. “One way is to try to provide what people eat at a lower price,” he said, and “another way to do that is to build better products at prices that we already have. Screw it.” Adding that consumers can choose better instead of cheaper products, he explains that “some people try to reduce artists. They have tried to make the same at a lower price, and I think they have failed in the market”

And we’re entering a gray area with every AI development that creates unprecedented legal disputes. “Anyone who tells you that the rules are logical, one way or the other, is making things up,” Neil Turkewitz, former Recording Industry Association of America executive director and leading expert on generative AI, said. About Fortune Jeremy Kahn. Meanwhile, Tennessee was the first state to ban this development, as Governor Bill Lee signed legislation in March designed to protect musicians’ intellectual property against AI attacks.

Without many legal hurdles, developers have moved forward. In the same interview with Forbes, Holz admitted that Midjourney did not ask permission from artists to use their work. “There’s no way to get a hundred million photos and know where they’re coming from,” he said he said.

Such behavior does not seem to be unique to the art world. “Unfortunately, some platforms and software developers are using AI to destroy creativity and compromise artists, songwriters, musicians and copyright holders,” the letter said.

Subscribe to the CEO Daily newsletter to get the CEO’s thoughts on the biggest topics in business. Log in for free.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *