Fear, Unbelief, Fear: Living under a law banning evictions in Texas | Women’s Rights Issues

Austin, Texas – When Trisha * found out she was pregnant in May last year, her closest abortion was more than 482km (300 miles) in Fort Worth, Texas.

A 27-year-old boy told Al Jazeera that he was not comfortable talking to anyone in his hometown or family – so after being pregnant for about eight weeks, he took her to an abortion clinic.

After spending $ 150 on gas to get to Fort Worth, he relied on himself at the Whole Woman’s Health parking lot before heading out in search of this.

“It pains me to realize that in our community there are people and my family who can dismiss women for unknowingly seeking these things.” “There are also people in fearful and uncertain places who have no chance and need to find a solution to their problems.”

Now, Texas across the United States laws prohibiting excessive abortion, Trisha said she would probably have had a different choice if the law had been in the literature when she needed to have an abortion. “Between spending a lot of money to get out of the government and get a hotel room, as well as booking someone to go with me, I might have tried to coax home,” he said.

‘I was scared’

The Texas legislature passed Senate Bill 8 in May, with his supporters calling it a “measure to protect the lives of the unborn”.

Many human rights advocates have decided that the law should be repealed in the courts as are the same rules in the past. But the US Supreme Court he refused to take action in August, and in October the criminal law that suspended the ordinance was he rolled quickly Texas asked for his reinstatement.

This means that the law, which prohibits abortion after six weeks of pregnancy and allows any citizen to sue anyone who provides or assists in the abortion process. However, a major ban on abortion services has not stopped patients from seeking help.

Many are still appearing in hospitals, thinking that the media is exaggerating or misunderstanding the law, says Marva Sadler, director of medical services at Whole Woman’s Health, who specializes in four hospitals in Texas.

But hospitals, bound by the new law, are forced to evict people. “They come with the hope that we can help them,” Sadler told Al Jazeera. “There is a moment of frustration, of not believing that this is the thing – and then the moment of fear and what I will do next.”

The same sentiments affected Jessy Lieck, a 30-year-old law student in Lubbock, Texas.

“When SB8 started working I was scared, because I’m sure a lot of people did,” Lieck said. “If my contraceptives fail or I am raped and after six weeks, I will be forced to carry the rapist’s child, which is very painful.”

Civil rights activists in the orange and anti-fertility movement promoting blue met in Routunda at the Texas State Capitol in 2013 [File: Mike Stone/Reuters]

For years, Lieck has been in need of tubal ligation surgery to prevent pregnancy, but even the operation is difficult to find in Texas, where doctors have told him he prefers to treat older women who have already had children. After encountering SB8, his search began in earnest. He found a doctor who approved the procedure, which was scheduled for early December.

“I recognize the opportunities I have with health insurance through university, financial stability, and access to education,” he said. Others have no chance. ”

A list of rules

SB8 is the most recent Texas law prohibiting the possibility of abortion.

In 2012, Parliament ordered a sonogram with a waiting period of 24 hours before patients underwent the procedure. The following year, a legal agreement was needed with local hospitals for the operation of abortion clinics, which led to the closure of many government facilities. And in 2017, it banned the largest abortion insurance policy.

But the fight against fertility in Texas is showing larger, a world war. Opponents of abortions have said they want to overturn Roe v Wade, a 1973 US Supreme Court decision that established women’s right to terminate their pregnancy.

Former United States President Donald Trump has backed the idea of ​​removing Roe v Wade by appointing three caretaker judges to the Supreme Court in his time.

But even in Texas, where the current war on infertility has passed years ago, that idea seems unlikely to freedom fighters until August 31. That same night, Diana Gomez revived a U.S. Supreme Court page.

Gomez, director of Procress Texas, had seen SB8 go up through committees to hand over parliament in May, but said he hoped the Supreme Court would take action before the money was spent, as well as governments with restrictions on abortion.

“When it got to midnight, it was the first incident in which the Supreme Court had never used Roe v Wade,” Gomez told Al Jazeera, about the SB8 that went into operation. “It was one of the first dangerous future tips that Roe v Wade was transformed into.”

In December, the country’s highest court will hear case from Mississippi regarding the ban on abortions after 15 weeks that could bring down the Roe v Wade, opening the door to abortions by other countries.

Regardless of the decision, however, the success of SB8 encourages other countries to pass laws banning or banning abortion services. One such coin is already going to Florida. “It’s not just Texas that wants to pass this on, I agree,” Gomez said.

Higher costs

In the meantime, Texans seeking an abortion should rely on at least 10 nonprofit organizations that provide funding to help them get out of the state. But the number of requests is more than most groups can afford.

One such group, the Texas Choice Fund, says it receives 10 to 15 calls a week from people seeking financial assistance to have an abortion before the Texas law is enacted. After September 1, the number of phones ranging to 15 per day.

People go to the Women’s Market at the Texas State Capitol in Austin, Texas [Stephen Spillman/AP Photo]

In the past, the agency has provided between $ 500 and several thousand dollars for each patient to receive treatment. Now, each requires an additional $ 1,000 to cover travel, lodging, and food on their way out of the state.

“The need has increased and obviously, we can’t add to it,” said Anna Rupani, chief executive of Fund Texas Choice. “This is not sustainable.”

He said more than 65 percent of Fund Texas Choice customers are people of color who are often poor. This means that they face serious financial difficulties in raising a child or going out of state to have an abortion.

“Most of the people who are looking for an abortion job are people who are already struggling to make ends meet, usually blacks, Indians and blacks,” Rupani said.

Aimee Arrambide, chief executive of Avow Texas, a reproductive rights watchdog, also said this. “With this law, in addition to the chaos, including the lack of resources, there will be thousands of people in Texas who are forced to have unwanted pregnancies,” she said.

* Respondent spoke to Al Jazeera using a false name for confidentiality

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *